Critique Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Critique - Essay ExampleIn essence, bonnyified thieving tail end be committed in Buddhistic tradition, in a specified circumstance. Justified thievery in Buddhist tradition is committed with the objective of countering dishonesty. For example, I have witnessed Sakka commit a justified theft by larceny a stolen relic from Brahmin Dona, which would have resulted to a dishonor of Buddhas relic. Additionally, the article depicts that, in Sri Lanka, there is a belief that a relic would disappear if it were non properly venerated. Essentially, the article demonstrates that a relic has the power to consent its own theft, and this is better understood as a theft not being a theft (Trainor, 1992 p7). 2. What did you find difficult to understand from the article? I found difficulty in understanding why appointment would arise among the eight territorial clans because they all want to own part of the relic. I also do not understand the reason why the clans, would not settle on establish ing a single location in which the whole of the relic would have been put for to ensure easier veneration. Instead, they settled on dividing the relics among themselves, which resulted in many individuals stealing the relic while other clans became unsatisfied. Moreover, I come short of understanding why the followers of Buddhist tradition would resolve to violate the traditions principles just to own the relic of the traditions founder (Trainor, 1992 p12). 3. What did the author do well, either in her argument or in presentation? The author did well, in the article, by providing a presentation that had an introduction of how the Buddhist tradition came to have a number of venerated relics. He also depicted how the fantasy of theft not a theft is established by providing various examples in Buddhist tradition and texts. Furthermore, his arguments are based on authoritative scriptural warrants, and thus, his article has arguments that are factual in nature. The presentation is chro nological in the sense that it entails events that preceded the immediate death of Buddha. The article also enjoys a deep understanding of the Buddhist tradition and relics. Evidently, the author satisfactorily discussed how, in Buddhist tradition, a theft that is not a theft is committed. He shows this by discussing that a relic is powerful in that it can scarcely be stolen from a place where it is not properly venerated. Lastly, the author did well by pointing out problematic areas in Buddhist tradition firstly, the act of stealing is forbidden in Buddhist tradition, but acts of stealing relics exist. Secondly, the act of being attached to a relic is against the Buddhist teaching of being attached to objects, which can be put under human possession and manipulation (Trainor, 1992 p20). 4. What do you think the author could have do better? The author could have done better by giving the discussion on relics a different approach apart from the concept of theft not a theft. The con cept could have entailed something like honoring a dishonored cause. This would eliminate the negativity that has been associated with a tradition whose founder had attained a high form of enlightenment. Additionally, the author would have justified the above premise by providing scriptural warrants from Buddhist tradition and text. This would have resulted in a positive depiction of Buddhist tradition and the idea of veneration (Trainor, 1992 p3). 5. What personal reflections came to mind while reading the